@article{oai:repository.ninjal.ac.jp:00000509,
 author = {角田, 三枝 and TSUNODA, Mie},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {国立国語研究所論集, NINJAL Research Papers},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {本論は,日本語の譲歩条件または譲歩の意味を表す節連接表現(clause-linkage markers。CLMと略す)を扱い,以下の三つのグループに分け,以下の(a)から(d)を述べる。グループA:-(y)oo=ga,-(y)oo=to,-(y)oo=to=mo,-te=mo グループB:=ni se-yo,=ni si-ro,=ni si-te=mo グループC:=to=wa i-e,=to i-t-te=mo,=to=wa i-u=monono (a)上の三つのグループのCLMの形態的特徴と使い分けは,角田/Tsunoda(2003,2004,forthcoming)が提案した「節連接とモダリティの階層」が反映している。(b)先行研究では,譲歩条件節のタイプを三つに分けている。Alternative concessive conditionals, Universal concessive conditionals, Scalar concessive conditionalsである。本論は,そのAlternative concessive conditionalsを「肯定否定」(Polar)と「併記」(Listing)の二つに分けることを提案し,四つの従属節のタイプに分ける。「肯定否定」と「併記」の区別はCLMの用法に反映している。この四つのタイプの違いが,従属節の表す確信度に反映する。具体的には,「肯定否定 < 普遍的,併記 < 極値」という階層である。(c)上の三つのグループのCLMの形態的多様性(動詞の活用形,および助詞などによる)は,従属節の意味,およびモダリティの違いを表す。特に,CLM に含まれる動詞の異なる活用形は,話者が従属節の内容にどの程度の確信を込めて表すかの違いを示す。つまり,CLM がepistemic modalityを表す。(d)上の三つのグループのCLMの表す確信度は,「グループA < グループB < グループC」の順番で高い。また,各グループ内でもCLMによって表す確信度が違う。, This paper deals with Japanese clause-linkage markers ('CLMs' hereafter) that have a concessive conditional meaning or a concessive meaning. It divides them into three groups and demonstrates the four points listed in (a) to (d) below. Group A: -(y)oo=ga, -(y)oo=to, -(y)oo=to=mo, -te=mo Group B: =ni se-yo, =ni si-ro, =ni si-te=mo Group C: =to=wa i-e, =to i-t-te=mo, =to=wa i-u=monono. (a) The morophological properties and uses of these CLMs are reflected in the five-level classification of clause-linkage that I have proposed (Tsunoda 2003, 2004, and forthcoming). (b) A previous study divided Concessive conditionals into three construction types: Alternative concessive conditionals, Universal concessive conditionals, and Scalar concessive conditionals. This paper divides Alternative concessive conditionals into two separate types, 'Polar' and 'Listing', distinguishing four types in all. The distinction between 'Polar' and 'Listing' is reflected in the uses of CLMs. These four types of Concessive conditionals indicate different degrees of belief/confidence expressed by the subordinate clause: Polar < Universal, Listing < Scalar. (c) The morphological properties of these CLMs -- in particular the verbal inflectional morphology contained in them -- express epistemic modality. Specifically, they indicate different degrees of the speaker's belief/confidence in the likelihood of the existence/occurrence of the situation described by a given concessive conditional/concessive clause. (d) The degree of the speaker's belief/confidence expressed by the three groups of CLMs above conforms to a hierarchy: Group A < Group B < Group C. Also, individual CLMs in each group express different degrees of speaker belief/confidence., application/pdf},
 pages = {109--137},
 title = {節連接マーカーにおける動詞の活用形とモダリティ},
 year = {2012},
 yomi = {ツノダ, ミエ}
}