@article{oai:repository.ninjal.ac.jp:00000493,
 author = {角田, 三枝 and TSUNODA, Mie},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {国立国語研究所論集, NINJAL Research Papers},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {本論は日本語のCLMのモノノとナイマデモを考察して,以下のことを示す。(i)モノノとナイマデモの意味と用法は,角田(2003,2004)が提案した「節連接とモダリティの階層」の五つのレベルによって使い分けられている。(ii)モノノとナイマデモは,類似の意味を表す場合もあるが,モノノは逆接(adversative)を表し,ナイマデモは逆接(adversative)と譲歩条件(concessive conditional)の両方の意味を表す。(iii)モノノは,逆接(adversative)の意味の中でも,その下位分類の一つである限定(restrictive)を主に表すCLMである。(iv)限定(restrictive)の意味に六つのパターンを設定し,図示する。モノノは,六つの全てのパターンを表す。ナイマデモは,六つのうち二つのパターンを表す。(v)ナイマデモが,逆接(adversative)の意味を表す場合は,その下位分類の一つである限定(restrictive)の意味を表す。譲歩条件の意味を表す場合は,極値譲歩条件(scalar concessive conditionals)の一種の意味を表し,特に「極値ではない」ということを表す。この意味は,限定(restrictive)の二つのパターンと密接な関係がある。(vi)モノノの意味・用法の通時的な変化は,「節連接とモダリティの階層」の五つのレベルの観点から考察すると,文法化が一定方向(unidirectional)に進むという理論に対する反例である。, The present paper examines two of the clause-linkage markers ('CLMs') of Japanese - =monono and -nai=mademo - and shows the following. (i) The meaning and use of =monono and -nai=mademo can be neatly differentiated and described in terms of the five-level classification of clause linkage proposed by Tsunoda (2003, 2004). (ii) Although =monono and -nai=mademo often have similar meanings, they differ in that =monono has only the adversative meaning, while -nai=mademo has the adversative meaning and also the concessive conditional meaning. (iii) =monono is mainly used for the meaning of 'restrictive', a subtype of the adversative. (iv) The meaning of 'restrictive' can be divided into six sub-patterns. =monono is used for all of the six sub-patterns. On the other hand, -nai=mademo is used only for two of the six sub-patterns. (v) When -nai=mademo is used as an adversative CLM, it has the restrictive meaning. On the other hand, when it is used as a concessive conditional CLM, it has the meaning of a subtype of scalar concessive conditional. This meaning is closely related to two of the six sub-patterns of the meaning of 'restrictive'. (vi) When examined in terms of the five-level classification of clause linkage, the diachronic changes in the meaning and use of =monono constitute a counterexample to the unidirectional hypothesis of grammaticalization., application/pdf},
 pages = {107--134},
 title = {モノノとナイマデモ : 節連接の五つのレベルにおける逆接と譲歩条件},
 year = {2011},
 yomi = {ツノダ, ミエ}
}