{"created":"2025-07-22T04:14:09.993641+00:00","id":2000517,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"88ec7d42-0048-4fb1-b994-64fac8b9b10c"},"_deposit":{"created_by":26,"id":"2000517","owner":"26","owners":[26],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000517"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.ninjal.ac.jp:02000517","sets":["38:1753149251844"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_biblio_info_40":{"attribute_name":"bibliographic_information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2025-07","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"187","bibliographicPageStart":"167","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"29","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国立国語研究所論集","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"NINJAL Research Papers","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_36":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では，日本語学習者の意見文における証拠使用がアカデミック・ライティング教育を通じてどのように発展したかを，「十分性」「信頼性」「説得性」の三つの観点から分析し，考察した。アカデミック・ライティング授業を受けた結果，学習者の証拠使用における「十分性」については，証拠の件数や証拠に対する主張の比率に有意な差は見られなかったが，外部からアクセス可能な証拠の大幅な増加や証拠が使われる位置の改善が確認された。一方で，「信頼性」と「説得性」に関しては，統計的に有意な向上が認められた。具体的には，証拠の出所が明確になり，規範的に使用されるようになったことで，証拠の「信頼性」が向上した。また，証拠に基づいた推論が明確になり，証拠と主張の間で論理的飛躍が減少したことで，「説得性」が高まった。しかし，改善が難しい点もあった。証拠の件数や証拠に対する主張の比率の増加が限定的であり，「経験」や「データ」といった証拠に関する説明が不十分である点が指摘された。また，「権威的意見」の表示範囲が曖昧であり，証拠に対する誤った理解や証拠に基づく推論における論理的飛躍が依然として存在することが分かった。これらの課題を解決するためには，作文教育と論文執筆教育のギャップを埋めることが重要であり，論証力を育む体系的なライティング教育が望まれる。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_description_37":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This study examines how Japanese learners develop their use of evidence in opinion essays through academic writing education, focusing on three aspects: \"sufficiency,\" \"reliability,\" and \"persuasiveness.\" Findings show no significant change in sufficiency regarding the quantity of evidence or its ratio to claims. However, learners demonstrated increased use of externally accessible evidence and improved positioning of evidence within their arguments. In contrast, reliability and persuasiveness showed statistically significant improvements. The clarity and normative citation of sources enhanced reliability, while clearer reasoning and reduced logical gaps between evidence and claims strengthened persuasiveness. Despite these improvements, challenges remain. The increase in evidence quantity and its ratio to claims was limited, and explanations of evidence, such as \"personal experience\" or \"data,\" were often insufficient. Additionally, ambiguity in citing \"authoritative opinions\" and issues like misinterpretation of evidence and logical gaps in reasoning persisted. To address these challenges, bridging the gap between general composition and academic writing education is essential. A systematic approach to writing instruction is needed to cultivate stronger argumentative skills.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_description_51":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"identifier_registration","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15084/0002000517","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_publisher_39":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"国立国語研究所","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_41":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2186-1358","subitem_source_identifier_type":"EISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_52":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorAffiliations":[{"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationName":"中山大学","affiliationNameLang":"ja"},{"affiliationName":"Sun Yat-sen University","affiliationNameLang":"en"}]}],"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"楊, 秀娥","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"YANG, Xiue","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2025-07-25"}],"displaytype":"detail","fileDate":[{"fileDateType":"Issued","fileDateValue":"2025-07"}],"filename":"papers2909.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"861.6 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_0","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"papers2909.pdf","url":"https://repository.ninjal.ac.jp/record/2000517/files/papers2909.pdf"},"version_id":"199befe9-4ceb-4c61-82c5-3f37ffd67cd7"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"アカデミック・ライティング","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"専門日本語教育","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"論証のレトリック","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"証拠／エビデンス","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"推論","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"academic writing","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Japanese for specific purposes","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"rhetoric of argumentation","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"evidence","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"UDC"},{"subitem_subject":"reasoning","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"item_resource_type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"日本語学習者の意見文における証拠使用の発達","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"日本語学習者の意見文における証拠使用の発達","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Development of Japanese Learners' Evidence Use in Opinion Essays","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"26","path":["1753149251844"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2025-07-25"},"publish_date":"2025-07-25","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000517","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["日本語学習者の意見文における証拠使用の発達"],"weko_creator_id":"26","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2025-07-25T00:18:55.101617+00:00"}