@article{oai:repository.ninjal.ac.jp:00001167,
 author = {尾崎, 喜光 and OZAKI, Yoshimitsu},
 journal = {研究報告集, Occasional Papers},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {国立国語研究所, 本研究は，発話による対人効果について言及した新聞の投書をデータとして，言語生活における発話の対人効果の一端を明らかにしょうとした。本稿では，読者に対する投稿者のそうした投書行動をメタコミュニケーション行動ととらえ，この分析を行なった。その結果次のことが明らかになった。若い主婦がこの種のメタコミュニケーションを多く行なう。自分に向けて何か言われた時に最も生じやすい。発話者が投稿者本人である場合は中年層・男性・会社員の発話についてが多いが，発話者が投稿者以外でその属性が明らかな場合は若年層（や中年層）・男性・サービス業の発話が多い。発話者と投稿者の関係は，通りすがりやサービス業や親族の関係が多い。また相手と投稿者の関係は，投稿者本人やその親族や通りすがりの関係が多い。発話の効果先は「相手としての投稿者」が最も多く（63％），「〈……〉と言われて私は△△だった。」という投書がメタコミュニケーション行動の基本パタンとなっている。効果をもたらしたものは，「発話のみ」が7割程度，「発話＋非言語行動」が1割程度，「発話＋実質行動」が2割程度であった。パラ言語
的特徴については，発話と一緒になって効果をもたらしていると考えられるケースが2割程度あった。効果の種類は，プラスの効果が48％，マイナスの効果が45％，中立の効果が6％であった。, In this study we analyze the interpersonal effects of utterances, based on data from readers' columns (letters to the editor). In the contributions(letters) that we examine, the contributors describe naturally occuring utterances and accompanying behaviors. We analyze the contributions themselves as a type of metacommunication behavior. Such metacommunications are most often performed by young housewives, and they most often occur as a result of the contributor having been addressed by someone else. When the contributor is also the speaker of the original utterance, the utterances of male office workers are most often described. On the other hand, when the original speaker is someone other than the contributor, the utterances of young-to-middle-aged male service workers are most often described. The most common relationships between speakers and contributors are passers-by, services and kinship. On the other hand, while the addressees were most often the contributors themselves, other relationships between addressees and contributors are kinship and passers-by. The persons affected by the utterances are most frequently contributors who were addressees(63%). Thus, the most common pattern for this type of metacommunication might be paraphrased as “Someone said '……' to me,which made me feel ……” In about 70% of the cases, the effects of the utterances are described as having been produced by speech alone. In about 10% of the cases the effects are described as having been produced by speech plus nonverbal communication, and in about 20% by speech plus other behavior.Paralinguistic features accompanying the utterances contributed to the effects in about 20% of the cases. In 48% of the cases the effects are described as positive, in 45% as negative,and in 6% as neutral., application/pdf, 17の書名 : 国立国語研究所研究報告集},
 pages = {1--31},
 title = {発話がもたらす対人効果の研究（1) : 投書におけるメタコミュニケーション行動の分析},
 volume = {16},
 year = {1995},
 yomi = {オザキ, ヨシミツ}
}